> that didn't really have much to do with what the article is actually about. That was a quote of the author not just the headline > It's a criticism of the t

> that didn't really have much to do with what the article is actually about. That was a quote of the author not just the headline > It's a criticism of the training data sets used on ai's that were manually tagged by individuals Again though this is just a fraction of AI. Lumping all of AI into the realm of ‘manually curated supervised learning’ is just incorrect, yet the author seems to think that’s all there is, it’s either that or they are just trying to make a headline. > For a great real world example of this happening right now I hardly think a controversy about a random text game on the internet warrants such a serious tone