3 ms·
That's because that was an inane point used as a headline that didn't really have much to do with what the article is actually about. It's a criticism of the t
by grawprog 5y ago
That's because that was an inane point used as a headline that didn't really have much to do with what the article is actually about.
It's a criticism of the training data sets used on ai's that were manually tagged by individuals that's led to some extreme biases in ai behaviour resulting in real world consequences.
For a great real world example of this happening right now, there's a fairly large scandal and a whole bunch of angry people over the problems caused by latitude's choice of training material for their ai driven text adventure game.
https://gitgud.io/AuroraPurgatio/aurorapurgatio https://gitgud.io/AuroraPurgatio/aurorapurgatio
- PoignardAzur 5y agoGlancing at the table of contents... > X. Count Grey: Enslavement and Slaughter of Children >XI. Kyros: Kidnapping, Enslavement, Unethical Experimentation, and Torture What the hell am I about to read?
- grawprog 5y agoThe training data for Ai Dungeon. https://play.aidungeon.io/ https://play.aidungeon.io/
- jjcon 5y ago> that didn't really have much to do with what the article is actually about. That was a quote of the author not just the headline > It's a criticism of the training data sets used on ai's that were manually tagged by individuals Again though this is just a fraction of AI. Lumping all of AI into the realm of ‘manually curated supervised learning’ is just incorrect, yet the author seems to think that’s all there is, it’s either that or they are just trying to make a headline. > For a great real world example of this happening right now I hardly think a controversy about a random text game on the internet warrants such a serious tone