> Who are you to decide whether his work is or is not art? > I agree that censorship isn't relevant here in the sense that it's applied to art, And the articl

> Who are you to decide whether his work is or is not art? > I agree that censorship isn't relevant here in the sense that it's applied to art, And the article and headline about an "artist" makes it look like a "work of art" is being censored. And who are you to decide it's a work of art? It's not. If you think otherwise, you are entitled to your opinion. > That store really is a public place, and the computers within it are basically public in every sense of the word. They are owned by Apple and you are allowed to use them per Apple's discretion. The same argument extends about public places - the park is public doesn't mean you can go there and take a dump. Regardless what constitutes a public place, there are norms.