4 ms·
Also puzzled about this too, since the pricing scheme differs from a per/usage AWS fee. Maybe they're going the way of traditional shared hosting companies by b
by neoveller 15y ago
Also puzzled about this too, since the pricing scheme differs from a per/usage AWS fee. Maybe they're going the way of traditional shared hosting companies by banking on a very small percentage of their users actually ever achieving high traffic?
- neoveller 15y agoFollowing up here... "starting at 19 /mo" ... and then the lowest cost plan is $29/mo. Just sayin'.
- thaumaturgy 15y agoThey're pulling the same skeezy trick that one of my local web/email hosting competitors pulls -- and for which I teased them publicly in our latest advertising. You only get the advertised rate if you pay the full year in advance. This allows them to advertise a "monthly" rate that is actually "$holycow/12" while also advertising "no commitments!" edit: and, at 613M of RAM ... I'm not sure exactly what someone would plan to do with such an instance of Windows, but it won't be much.
- dav-id 15y agoThe pricing and specs compared with a dedicated server from Hetzner.de running windows server 2008 web are absolutely mad