4 ms·
The latest commit to that anonymously authored repo is over a year ago. I am a bit tired of these "we are an anonymous group pushing the truth" efforts; in the
by raphlinus 5y ago
The latest commit to that anonymously authored repo is over a year ago. I am a bit tired of these "we are an anonymous group pushing the truth" efforts; in the case of HCQ they are unmitigated bullshit.
The best sourced argument for lab leak is the Drastic project[1]. This is basically the work that's been getting the media attention for the last few weeks.
A good source for arguments holding the lab leak unlikely (there is of course no evidence strong enough to rule it out entirely) is episodes 760 and 762 of the podcast This Week in Virology[2]. Skeptics of authority would say that this is the community of virologists covering their own back. Others who basically believe in science [ETA: meaning basically trust scientists; this is a pretty complex concept to unpack] will find passionate and knowledgeable experts explaining why they find the lab leak hypothesis unlikely.
[1]: https://drasticresearch.org/ https://drasticresearch.org/
[2]: https://www.microbe.tv/twiv/ https://www.microbe.tv/twiv/
- newrotik 5y agoAnother compact source of information that is well referenced and is being kept up to date is here: https://jamiemetzl.com/origins-of-sars-cov-2/ https://jamiemetzl.com/origins-of-sars-cov-2/
- raphlinus 5y agoI grant you that this is well researched. However, readers should bear in mind that this resource is first and foremost a persuasive effort in favor of the lab leak hypothesis.