4 ms·
It's true that Windows 7's changes were mostly internal. But it's not true that they were minor changes from Vista. Vista had serious technical problems with m
by garethrowlands 5y ago
It's true that Windows 7's changes were mostly internal. But it's not true that they were minor changes from Vista.
Vista had serious technical problems with memory consumption, which Windows 7 addressed. It also had perceived-but-not-real problems due to superfetch and PCs being sold with too little memory or too weak graphics - changing the name may have helped with that.
But the technical changes were real. Windows 7 rearchitected GDI - offloading it to the GPU (AKA WDDM 1.1 / DXGI) - so that using it didn't cause the bits of each window to be retained in system memory. So Windows 7 can open as many Notepad windows full screen as you like, whereas Vista with DWM enabled cannot.
And Windows 7 rearchitected how services load. Vista had introduced lots of features, implemented as services, but it loaded them all on startup and kept them in memory. Windows 7 introduced a mechanism to load them when the features were actually used, saving memory and startup time.
And then there's the list of visible features, which, as you can see, is pretty large: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Features_new_to_Windows_7 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Features_new_to_Windows_7
- ToFab123 5y agoTo a large extend Vista and Windows 7 was the same OS. Windows 7 just had a lot of performance improvement but all the major technical redesigns and improvements came with Vista. I was happy to have a powerful PC that was more than capable of running Vista so I never saw any of the issues that people complain about with Vista. When Windows 7 came out it was just like Vista had a service pack applied. Windows 7 was not a major step away from Vista. This new Windows 11 I suspect is the same. Just an incremental update from Windows 10 with some added Marketing play in form of a new version number.