4 ms·
One crucial bit of shared context that gets mostly missed…lunch. Not having lunch together has been, IME, the single biggest indicator of a dysfunctional team.
by curun1r 5y ago
One crucial bit of shared context that gets mostly missed…lunch. Not having lunch together has been, IME, the single biggest indicator of a dysfunctional team.
The neat thing about lunch is that the conversations are entirely non-directed without feeling like the time is being wasted in a meeting. Conversations can cover a specific project, when a high degree of coordination is necessary, generalized venting, when there are shared frustrations or just be about non-work topics that help a team bond and get to know each other as people rather than workers. It’s like a meeting that doesn’t feel like a meeting that can be strategic or therapeutic as needed. There’s really no way to replicate the beneficial effects of eating lunch together when workers are remote.
As a manager, this has also been one of my go-to tricks for successful cross-team projects lasting any significant amount of time. I tell one of my team members to setup a lunch with at least one member of the other team on a weekly basis and use the incentive of authorizing the company to pay for it. For ~$20/person/week, the cross-team communications issues basically disappear. It’s ridiculously cost effective and almost magical in how well it works.
- flowerlad 5y agoThere are online alternatives to lunch. Such as online games. Try it, it is great for team building.
- curun1r 5y agoHard disagree. There's something about eating with someone that taps into our lizard brains' survival instincts...eating together == allies. Online games may work for people who like online games, but anyone who doesn't like them is going to feel resentment at being made to waste time doing something they don't enjoy. Lunch is something that everyone is already doing, so no one will consider the time wasted, especially if they're getting free food out of it.