3 ms·
The implication is that they’ll quit if they don’t get to work remotely, not that they’ll be fired.
by jdlshore 5y ago
The implication is that they’ll quit if they don’t get to work remotely, not that they’ll be fired.
- eyelidlessness 5y agoRight so the implication is that if Apple arbitrarily refuses to continue accommodating them they’re agreeing to terminate employment. This is how most employment disputes of this nature go: - Emplployer: we won’t/will cease to accommodate you in this meaningful way - Employees: we’re not being accommodated and have a reasonable expectation to be; if you don’t meet those expectations we effectively can’t work for you - Employer: bye!