3 ms·
As I wrote, there could be an exception for non-voting stock. At least temporarily. But ultimately, it's supposed to change the paradigm. Because currently the
by anoncake 5y ago
As I wrote, there could be an exception for non-voting stock. At least temporarily.
But ultimately, it's supposed to change the paradigm. Because currently the economy is run by paperclip maximizers that no human is held responsible for. Which is not ideal.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- bumby 5y agoNon voting shares are a minority already. Combine that with the fact that literally trillions of dollars would be aligned against such a idea, i fear it unfortunately relegates it to a thought experiment rather than a pragmatic policy proposal.
- anoncake 5y agoThat applies to literally everything that goes against business interests. It's not an insurmountable hurdle.
- bumby 5y agoThe difference here is that you would be uniting all business interests. Normally they are a fractured group with competing interests. It would take a truly revolutionary movement to enact that kind of change. Not impossible, but also not no particularly likely.