I'm glad they withdrew this. That said, it does appear that the subpoena was more selective than I initially thought, given the headlines. From the other USA To

I'm glad they withdrew this. That said, it does appear that the subpoena was more selective than I initially thought, given the headlines. From the other USA Today article: > The subpoena, issued in April, demands the production of records containing IP addresses and other identifying information "for computers and other electronic devices" that accessed the story during a 35-minute time frame starting at 8:03 p.m. on the day of the shooting. A 35-minute window could still produce a large number of readers, but I assume they had some other information that would have immediately narrowed it down or otherwise confirmed their suspicions.