> Second, everyone needs to be using unique passwords. You don’t have to use a password manager to do that, whatever system works for you is fine. If you want t

> Second, everyone needs to be using unique passwords. You don’t have to use a password manager to do that, whatever system works for you is fine. If you want to use a notebook in a desk drawer, that’s totally acceptable. You don't need a notebook for unique passwords. Just use the service's name. Unless you also meant unguessable, in which case a notebook is probably going to be insufficient because your brain-powered password generator will soon run out of entropy. > The tech press can review usability and onboarding experience, but can’t realistically evaluate any security claims, so how do you propose users tell the difference? "Security at the expense of usability, comes at the expense of security." Users don't need to know the difference because the only danger they need to protect themselves from is "my gmail was hacked" and the only requirement for that is that they use an un-guessable password saved somewhere unsophisticated attackers can't access. Any password manager accomplishes this. > An attacker (or malicious insider) in control of the vendor's network can change the code that is served to your browser Password managers have servers sending code over to the browser? After the installation process?