I hear that. But your examples fail because (e.g.) your house is not an unfalsifiable assertion about the cosmos. I get why you would make an unqualified rejec

I hear that. But your examples fail because (e.g.) your house is not an unfalsifiable assertion about the cosmos. I get why you would make an unqualified rejection of the concept of a Sky Daddy. In practice I do, too. We human beings have so much ahead of us, and arbitrary lifestyle demands and fevered imaginings of desert nomads dead over 2000 years don't have a place in our present, much less our future. Of the infinite set of all possible assertions about the nature of the cosmos, Sky Daddy is almost surely wrong. But then, I believe all assertions about the nature of the cosmos are all almost surely wrong.