5 ms·
Both of your perspectives are equally toxic... have kids if you want them, don't if you don't. I'm sure one can find happiness or misery either way
by stemlord 5y ago
Both of your perspectives are equally toxic... have kids if you want them, don't if you don't. I'm sure one can find happiness or misery either way
- ttt0 5y agoAnd telling someone to exercise is fatphobic, expecting people to be social is discriminating against people with aspergers, telling someone to meditate is anti-ADHD people. Do literally whatever you want, I'm sure you can somehow be happy no matter what you do. Toxicity, toxicity everywhere.
- stemlord 5y agoLOL raising a nuclear family isn't the only way to find happiness in life. How narrow minded do you have to be to think that?
- prepend 5y agoNeither perspective is toxic. I’m sure it’s knowable whether kids add or decrease happiness. And there’s probably some outlier set that feels differently than the population. Thinking this doesn’t mean anything about toxicity. Generally speaking I haven’t heard anyone use that word properly in years. It’s a pretty stupid word, unless dealing with chemicals and lethal doses.
- stemlord 5y agoYeah I shouldn't have used "toxic", it sets off people's SJW alarm
- xref 5y ago“Some people like peanut butter and jelly, some don’t, but both viewpoints are fascist.” You used both “toxic” and “sjw” incorrectly, I don’t think these words mean what you think they mean
- stemlord 5y agoI used neither of those words incorrectly and that's not what I said
- prepend 5y agoNot so much alarms, but incorrect usage of the word. Your misuse of toxic is toxic.
- tolbish 5y agoThe word 'toxic' has essentially lost all meaning.
- stemlord 5y agoNot a Britney fan I see