3 ms·
I think we're talking at different points, I was saying that we don't have like literal robots walking the streets who might accidentally wander into your hous
by jbooth 15y ago
I think we're talking at different points, I was saying that we don't have like literal robots walking the streets who might accidentally wander into your house, and you can't misclick your way into sticking up a liquor store.
Certainly if you have a whole set of willful misconduct associated with the act, like in this case, then it's illegal/wrong even if the page was wide open and prominently linked.
I guess I was just saying that you couldn't just hold someone culpable for a hit in the access log like you could for being in the wrong kitchen. The bar to prove bad intent is higher.
- tptacek 15y agoSure. Who disagrees with that? If you accidentally stumble onto an /admin page, say "shit!", send an email to the site and then log off, who thinks you should be charged with a crime? Nobody does.