3 ms·
Agricultural-zoned land would be cheaper. I would rip up urban zoning with an LVT to ensure density, but keep the agricultural zoning because we can't eat skys
by Ericson2314 5y ago
Agricultural-zoned land would be cheaper.
I would rip up urban zoning with an LVT to ensure density, but keep the agricultural zoning because we can't eat skyscrapers.
- dodobirdlord 5y agoThere is no actual tradeoff between availability of food and availability of skyscrapers. Even if we actively tried, we couldn’t run out of agricultural land in the US by building on it.