4 ms·
>wouldn’t implementing those be easier (for both you and the rest of the world) than creating a completely new protocol? Maybe. One the other hand, WebDav and
by LinAGKar 5y ago
>wouldn’t implementing those be easier (for both you and the rest of the world) than creating a completely new protocol?
Maybe. One the other hand, WebDav and SFTP may be more widely supported than those extensions already.
>Aren’t multiple ports only an “issue” if you assume NAT (and CGNAT, shudder) as a natural state of things?
NAT is unfortunately something ubiquitous. And the multiple ports makes FTP harder to tunnel.