3 ms·
>The economist is trying to redefine "bullshit jobs" to mean simply "jobs which hold no value to anybody" That is not the case. They don't talk about who the j
by simonh 5y ago
>The economist is trying to redefine "bullshit jobs" to mean simply "jobs which hold no value to anybody"
That is not the case. They don't talk about who the jobs do or don't have value to at all anywhere in the article, they only address the evidence Graeber used as the basis of his book - how employees think and feel about their own employment.
I don't know about the research they are citing, perhaps that does what you say.
- pydry 5y agoIt is the case. It's apparent if you diff the survey questions they relied upon from the ones Graeber used.