The endgame of the people isn’t relevant to whether the law is good or bad, legal or illegal. This group is for gun rights and seems to want to remove all rest

The endgame of the people isn’t relevant to whether the law is good or bad, legal or illegal. This group is for gun rights and seems to want to remove all restrictions, thus the pictures of happy people with guns, etc. It seems their aim isn’t to figure out what firearms are too dangerous, so they won’t be participating in that discussion. Assuming that everyone shares my problem and wants to solve it is not accurate. If I make a bad law that’s ambiguous, I shouldn’t expect enemies of that law’s aim to help me fix it, but to destroy it. Some people don’t want gun limitations.