>whatever strawman of the week is used to attack a caricature of a position Is it really a strawman when a non-negligible number of people in your political ca

>whatever strawman of the week is used to attack a caricature of a position Is it really a strawman when a non-negligible number of people in your political camp espouse a position without so much as a hint of irony or exaggeration? Denying the existence of the radicals won't win you any credibility with fence sitters and moderates.