3 ms·
You're assuming the truth of one side in the matter, with very limited information.
by meepmorp 5y ago
You're assuming the truth of one side in the matter, with very limited information.
- CRConrad 5y agoThis is the umpteenth time I've seen this "But we don't know anything about it!" argument, and besides surprising me it's beginning to piss me off. We know quite a bit. Why do people keep claiming we don't -- just too lazy to read the thread where this stuff is repeatedly linked, or trying to promote some agenda? https://twitter.com/SarahBelleLin/status/1370071520953835520 https://twitter.com/SarahBelleLin/status/1370071520953835520 https://archive.is/Z55Oe https://archive.is/Z55Oe
- Barrin92 5y agonot that big of an assumption given that, as we have seen, the person in question had no reason to make that up and a lot to lose.
- borski 5y agoPeople have all sorts of reasons to air dirty laundry; publicity, for one. Assuming you know the whole story based on the retelling of one side in a tweet is a mistake.
- CRConrad 5y agoThere were reply tweets from the other guy in literally the same Twitter thread, so what "retelling of one side" are you talking about?