3 ms·
> Just because a technology is "old" doesn't mean it is useless, or needs to be replaced. I'm all in favor of fixing problems, and refactoring to improve flow a
by nwmcsween 5y ago
> Just because a technology is "old" doesn't mean it is useless, or needs to be replaced. I'm all in favor of fixing problems, and refactoring to improve flow and remove inefficiencies. I am not a fan of re-inventing the wheel because gee, we've had this particular wheel for 50 years and its doing fine but hey let's reimagine it anyway.
Can't get promotions if you don't NIH a slow half broken postgres
- edoceo 5y ago> slow half broken postgres Don't bring Postgres into this. Its fast and closer to zero-broken than to half-broken. ;)
- dkersten 5y agoI think you misunderstood the comment. It wasn't calling Postgres slow and half broken, it was making a stab at other home-brewed (NIH, Not Invented Here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_invented_here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_invented_here) databases, calling them slow, half baked copies of postgres, implying that they should have just used postgres, but that doing so wouldn't get them promotions.