4 ms·
A good overview of the evidence so far. Facts are hard to come by. It’s weight of evidence in context. https://swprs.org/on-the-origin-of-sars-coronavirus-2/
by neilwilson 5y ago
A good overview of the evidence so far.
Facts are hard to come by. It’s weight of evidence in context.
https://swprs.org/on-the-origin-of-sars-coronavirus-2/ https://swprs.org/on-the-origin-of-sars-coronavirus-2/
- dqv 5y agoAbsolutely AMAZING resource. Thank you for sharing this. It is much needed.
- raphlinus 5y agoAgreed, that looks surprisingly good to my admittedly non-expert eyes. Thanks for posting!
- raphlinus 5y agoHmm, now I'm a lot less sure. Both this website and the recent Vanity Fair article represent the "Drastic" team as heroes, but establishment public health people are less impressed. Here's a fascinating Twitter thread on the Drastic authors[1], though I'm sure their fans would dismiss this as an ad hominem attack. The fact that the SPR people are anonymous is something people should be aware of when deciding how much stock to put in them. [1]: https://twitter.com/wokeglobaltimes/status/1399187095764279303 https://twitter.com/wokeglobaltimes/status/13991870957642793...
- K2L8M11N2 5y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss_Policy_Research https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss_Policy_Research In 2017 a University of Zurich report on media in Switzerland analyzed "six of the most-discussed 'alternative media'", including SPR, that "resort to conspiracy theories." Daniel Vogler concluded that SPR appears to be a "a pseudoscientific media research project."