3 ms·
Co-terrestrial civilization is interesting, but it's difficult to understand how there would be no physical evidence. The ocean would be most likely (subterran
by mediaman 5y ago
Co-terrestrial civilization is interesting, but it's difficult to understand how there would be no physical evidence.
The ocean would be most likely (subterranean would be much more visible for any access points, by satellite and land-mapping LIDAR, or seismographs detecting underground industrial activity). But we get detritus washing up all the time on shores; for example, Japanese debris from the earthquake landed on western North American shores.
How does an aquatic super-civilization exist for hundreds (presumably thousands) of years with absolutely zero debris arriving on shores, or any evidence of mining or other industrial activity that would be required?
Interstellar seems more likely but of course we have the challenges of time and distance to explain.
- gfodor 5y agoIt's debatable if we'd know. The Earth is really old. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/04/are-we-earths-only-civilization/557180/ https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/04/are-we-e...
- bostonsre 5y agoMaybe they are wary of the fact that we are dangerous and they take sufficient precautions to avoid debris. But.. letting their craft get seen repeatedly doesn't mesh with that. It would be funny to see a dolphin in the cockpit of one of these things pull up next to a fighter jet and wave to him tho.