2 ms·
I would argue against that as there are very sophisticated aquatic life documented living at depths very hard for us to get to. Like imagine beings that can li
by andiareso 5y ago
I would argue against that as there are very sophisticated aquatic life documented living at depths very hard for us to get to.
Like imagine beings that can live at the very bottom of the ocean where the pressure is so high that it would just be too difficult for our devices to reach, but are themselves evolved enough to handle it :| IDK it's at least an interesting thought.
[EDIT]: We've only reached the "Challenger Depth" (bottom) a few times throughout history and they weren't huge mapping-type missions. It could also stand to reason they would build under the surface to avoid predators and such. It's a fun thought nevertheless. Much more fun to think about than just artifacts on a lens.