2 ms·
> They exist. They are real. They aren't ours. They aren't an adversary's, because a) the military would never admit it if that were possible and b) if it were
by AnIdiotOnTheNet 5y ago
> They exist. They are real. They aren't ours. They aren't an adversary's, because a) the military would never admit it if that were possible and b) if it were the case the adversary would have already taken over the world.
can't speak to a), but as for b), it is possible that what they are and what they appear to be are very different things. Imagine, say, a drone swarm with a very flat profile that could turn their surfaces towards a target and tighten up to present a radar cross section and become highly visible, but could flip to an edge-on position and disperse to disappear to both eyes and instruments. Two such swarms could easily mimic an instantaneous movement over a large distance, among other effects.
In other words, they might be moderately more advanced technology masquerading as ludicrously more advanced technology, presenting the appearance of a threat far greater than their inventors can actually produce.
- JumpCrisscross 5y ago> it is possible that what they are and what they appear to be are very different things Could also be a novel stealth mechanism screwing with our sensors.
- Apocryphon 5y agoImagine if there was some sort of exotic mechanism to "hack" radar.
- gfodor 5y agothis isn't a radar-only phenomenon. such a hack would need to involve fooling human senses, visual, and radar.
- gfodor 5y agothis is a genuinely interesting theory but it does seem like the kind of theory that the military would also imagine and, with the data they have, be able to falsify.