4 ms·

It's camera artefacts, dude.

JumpCrisscross 5y ago
> It's camera artefacts, dude Does the U.S. report take a view on this? I'm not particularly swung by the extraterrestrial hypothesis. But I am curious if this is a classified project, domestic or foreign, or just a series of similar artefacts.
- user-the-name 5y ago
  It doesn't need to. It's easy enough to view the videos and confirm that this is, in fact, what they are.
  - JumpCrisscross 5y ago
    > It doesn't need to. It's easy enough to view the videos and confirm So the U.S. government is going through the trouble of declassification to reveal the limits of its sensors to adversaries? From what we can tell, the reports categorise them as UFOs. That implies a non-artefact theory.
    - Apocryphon 5y ago
      This could all be a feint to claim their sensors are weaker than they really are.
      - king_magic 5y ago
        Doesn’t really pass the smell test. 80+ years of advancements in US gov’t radar tech, and these systems get fooled this easily? Hard to buy that IMO.
  - king_magic 5y ago
    That’s a pretty bold statement to make, especially when these objects were observed with multiple independent radar systems and multiple humans’ visual sight. Amazing what camera artifacts can do, isn’t it?
m_mueller 5y ago
Including their radar signatures?
- user-the-name 5y ago
  What evidence do you have of anything having any radar signature?
  - ssully 5y ago
    Some of the confirmed cases from the pentagon include the fact that they were detected on radar.
  - Diederich 5y ago
    Video released this week shows radar contact.
    - user-the-name 5y ago
      It also shows basically nothing else whatsoever. I could be literally anything.
      - m_mueller 5y ago
        I agree about that. Basically at this moment there are two ways to interpret these releases: US government / military is trolling everybody for whatever reason (cover-up, FUD), OR you trust them and there is something very interesting out there, whether it's earthly or not. In any case though, this goes beyond just some optical illusion or camera artifact.
king_magic 5y ago
Ah yes, camera artifacts make perfect sense - they totally explain visual sightings (tic tac) combined with multiple, independent radar system sightings of said tic tac. Just amazing that camera artifacts can mess with human vision that much. Oh wait, our eyes (and radar systems) aren’t cameras? Darn. There goes that idea.

> It's camera artefacts, dude Does the U.S. report take a view on this? I'm not particularly swung by the extraterrestrial hypothesis. But I am curious if this is a classified project, domestic or foreign, or just a series of similar artefacts.

user-the-name 5y ago
It doesn't need to. It's easy enough to view the videos and confirm that this is, in fact, what they are.
- JumpCrisscross 5y ago
  > It doesn't need to. It's easy enough to view the videos and confirm So the U.S. government is going through the trouble of declassification to reveal the limits of its sensors to adversaries? From what we can tell, the reports categorise them as UFOs. That implies a non-artefact theory.
  - Apocryphon 5y ago
    This could all be a feint to claim their sensors are weaker than they really are.
    - king_magic 5y ago
      Doesn’t really pass the smell test. 80+ years of advancements in US gov’t radar tech, and these systems get fooled this easily? Hard to buy that IMO.
- king_magic 5y ago
  That’s a pretty bold statement to make, especially when these objects were observed with multiple independent radar systems and multiple humans’ visual sight. Amazing what camera artifacts can do, isn’t it?

m_mueller 5y ago

Including their radar signatures?

user-the-name 5y ago
What evidence do you have of anything having any radar signature?
- ssully 5y ago
  Some of the confirmed cases from the pentagon include the fact that they were detected on radar.
- Diederich 5y ago
  Video released this week shows radar contact.
  - user-the-name 5y ago
    It also shows basically nothing else whatsoever. I could be literally anything.
    - m_mueller 5y ago
      I agree about that. Basically at this moment there are two ways to interpret these releases: US government / military is trolling everybody for whatever reason (cover-up, FUD), OR you trust them and there is something very interesting out there, whether it's earthly or not. In any case though, this goes beyond just some optical illusion or camera artifact.

king_magic 5y ago

Ah yes, camera artifacts make perfect sense - they totally explain visual sightings (tic tac) combined with multiple, independent radar system sightings of said tic tac. Just amazing that camera artifacts can mess with human vision that much. Oh wait, our eyes (and radar systems) aren’t cameras? Darn. There goes that idea.