4 ms·
If it's the same thread I'm thinking of, after reading it I wanted to show folks that Logo is a programming language, not a turtle graphics system.
by buescher 5y ago
If it's the same thread I'm thinking of, after reading it I wanted to show folks that Logo is a programming language, not a turtle graphics system.
- bmitc 5y agoProbably the same thread or threads. There was a couple posts that all hit the front page in the past week or two on the same day. I actually still have Brian Harvey’s full book series you posted in my Amazon cart. Here’s an interesting article that discusses the language book. https://citejournal.org/volume-20/issue-3-20/seminal-articles/reflections-on-exploring-language-with-logo/ https://citejournal.org/volume-20/issue-3-20/seminal-article...
- buescher 5y agoThanks - I enjoyed that. I'm tempted to track down my own copy of the language book.
- bmitc 5y agoNo problem! And thank you for this post! Maybe I should go ahead and hit purchase on Harvey's Logo book series now. There's also another book called Visual Modeling with Logo: A Structured Approach to Seeing that I've ordered that looks very interesting as well. I was drawn in by the description: ***** > Filled with striking illustrations, this book offers an exciting exploration of Logo graphics for designers, architects, liberal arts students, and other individuals who are interested in creative applications of computers. > Visual Modeling with Logo introduces the programming concepts necessary for describing and manipulating some of the basic visual structures in the world around us. Logo is a language that encourages visual problem-solving and helps us expand our understanding of how we see. > The book provides a wide range of exercises for investigating the many dimensions and component parts of seeing; it proceeds from the simple to the complex, using representative models based on circular grids, rectangular grids, Islamic designs, organic forms, and different spatial systems. ***** There's a few others books in a similar vain that I've found too: Learning Mathematics and Logo, Investigations in Algebra: An Approach to Using Logo, and Exploring Logo without a Computer. Then of course there's Turtle Geometry: The Computer as a Medium for Exploring Mathematics. I'm a big fan of books that use programming to explore other topics, and it seems Logo generated a lot of books like this. It's my own lofty dream to write my own series like these.
- kjander79 5y agoDefinitely, and Brian Harvey's books go a long way to showing just that: Logo is a full fledged language with wonderful pedagogical value, as well as a neat tool for easy exploratory programming, possibly better than more modern options like Python that suck all the air out of the room right now.
- buescher 5y agoI've always thought Logo syntax was not just easy but outright elegant. There could be a parallel universe where it continued to evolve into the de-facto-standard-scripting-language role Python has now.
- RodgerTheGreat 5y agoREBOL's syntax is in some ways very similar to Logo; perhaps we may yet see successful descendants in our own universe.
- leke 5y agoREBOL was one of the first languages I learned. Some parts were super powerful and easy, but I remember struggling with some parts of the language. I can't remember what those parts were now. Of all these compile to JS languages we see currently, it's a shame REBOL is not one of them. I might be tempted to pick it up again.
- bmitc 5y agoMaybe I should give Logo a try then when the book arrives.