3 ms·
This article is toxic and divisive. People interested in delivering engineering outcomes are interested in the outcome not their role in it. If you don't know
by SassyGrapefruit 5y ago
This article is toxic and divisive. People interested in delivering engineering outcomes are interested in the outcome not their role in it.
If you don't know enough about the toolchain to contribute meaningfully. Stop and learn about your toolchain. If you can contribute then contribute. If your contributions are rejected then try to understand why. There is probably a good reason.
If you think you can do it better then put your reputation on the line. Pick a fence, call your shot, and make a go of it. If you are delivering better outcomes I promise the vultures will come to you. If you come up short find something shiny and point your finger there.
- fagnerbrack 5y agoI would love to be away from people who believe "If you don't know X then you're not good for programming", so if it's divisive in that way then that's the post intention and I'm happy with it. Toxicity would be the programmers who believe in that statement, so I'm dividing myself from toxicity.