4 ms·
One anecdote certainly isn't “proof-of-falsehood”, be the veracity of the original statement what it may.
by rue 15y ago
One anecdote certainly isn't “proof-of-falsehood”, be the veracity of the original statement what it may.
- hzay 15y agoI meant proof-of-falsehood for myself. That is, I knew vaguely that a lot of things that were written in that article were not quite true, but I didn't have facts that showed them to be false, except for the quote in my original post. I didn't write all the facts I had against that because I felt that, if you do not believe my anecdote, offering more than one doesn't strengthen my case, and if you choose to believe it, I needn't offer more than one story.