4 ms·
Check the laws first. Some places only require one party (you the recorder) to consent.
by steego 5y ago
Check the laws first. Some places only require one party (you the recorder) to consent.
- nix23 5y ago>Some places only require one party (you the recorder) to consent Some places...nord Korea? You the recorder have to consent?? I consent to myself that i record others without their knowledge?
- cge 5y agoLaws around recording typically also cover cases where an outside person, who isn't a party in the conversation, is recording. The idea is that there are three possibilities: all parties in the conversation consent to recording, one of the parties consents (almost certainly the person who wants the recording), and none of the parties consent (ie, someone is spying on the conversation). One-party consent is legal in a variety of countries and regions of countries, while zero-party consent is illegal pretty much everywhere I know.
- nix23 5y agoThat's not what he said...if everyone consent that's called a interview.
- steego 5y agoTell me what I said.
- nix23 5y ago> Some places only require one party (you the recorder) to consent. That's whats you said, and it's not true, without consent from at least one recorded or being in a situation where recording is normal (tv etc) it's pretty much everywhere illegal. And i wrote 'Most Country's' which is a hint that there is some 'Some others'. There is even a Country where singing under the shower is forbidden, in MOST others...it's not.
- cromulent 5y agoMost of Australia, for example. https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/is-it-legal-to-record-a-phone-call-in-australia/ https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/is-it-legal-to...
- nix23 5y agoSounds a bit more complicated then what you think it is: >But the reality is that it is normally against the law to record a phone call without the other person’s consent. >In fact, ‘covertly’ (secretly) using a listening device such as a mobile phone or digital recorder and publishing or otherwise distributing that material can amount to a criminal offence. Recording private conversations: >The laws only apply to ‘private conversations’, which is one where the parties may reasonably assume that they don’t want to be overheard by others. >One of the exceptions to the prohibition against recording and/or publishing or distributing records of private conversations is where police officers have obtained what’s known as a ‘surveillance device warrant’ – also known as a ‘wire tap’ – which allows for the recorded material to be used for investigations and tendered in court provided, of course, that the material is relevant to the proceedings at hand. Between jurisdictions: >It is legal in all jurisdictions to record a phone call if ALL PARTIES to the phone call consent. https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/is-it-legal-to-record-a-phone-call-in-australia/ https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/is-it-legal-to... But hey if your a Police Officer working on a case your are correct, you don't need the Consent of the other person ;)
- cromulent 5y agoNo, it's just as simple as I think it is. Vic, Qld, NSW, SA, Tas, all OK. That's most of Aus.
- dvlsg 5y agoThe majority of the states in the US have one-party consent too, I believe.
- avhon1 5y agoYep. Here's a list of one-party recording consent states from [1]: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, District of Columbia, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana*, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming [1] https://recordinglaw.com/united-states-recording-laws/one-party-consent-states/ https://recordinglaw.com/united-states-recording-laws/one-pa...
- kbelder 5y agoOregon.
- nix23 5y agoOregon...Australia...that says everything...