3 ms·

F# is probably your only valid point though I'm not sure I'd call yet another functional programming language an innovation. Seadragon is Zooming technology th

F# is probably your only valid point though I'm not sure I'd call yet another functional programming language an innovation. Seadragon is Zooming technology that is, at best, a decent demo at this point (and probably designed to be patented). For people who don't know what we're talking about: http://zoom.it http://zoom.it Accelerator I'd never even heard of which is probably because it was introduced in 2006 and no finished product has ever come of it. Cleartype came out of the Microsoft e-books team which wasn't part of Microsoft Research to the best of my knowledge So giving you F# that makes two products: Surface and F# for $9 billion dollars per year. So either your argument is those two products cost the majority of that money to maintain or I go back to my original point. Microsoft Research's primary function at the company is to patent things

webjprgm 15y ago
Their work is used in the academic community. E.g. they have a suite for examining/debugging concurrency called CHESS which was used in a class I took in grad school and is related to and referenced by some of the research my (former) academic advisor professor does, which work is used by NASA to improve space program software.
- BananaRepublic 15y ago
  Yes, and like their other MS Research projects it's licenced under the 'Microsoft Research Licence' which means that whatever modifications/enhancements you do to the code can only be used within this academic setting. HOWEVER, Microsoft themselves can use your modifications for whatever purposes they want, like sell them. Sweet deal...
  - kelnos 15y ago
    As with any other software license (including the GPL), if you don't like the terms, don't use it.
    - rbanffy 15y ago
      Isn't it a bit misleading to put the MRL and the GPL in the same league? I agree with the "If you don't like the license, don't use the software" attitude, but the terms of the MRL are quite restrictive.
DaveMebs 15y ago
There are going to be plenty of things that come out of MS Research that people don't realize came from there (examples: PhotoSynth, Kinect). Expecting an exhaustive list is unrealistic. Furthermore, MS Research was founded over a decade ago when patent trolling was not as big a deal. It's pretty clear if you read about it that Bill Gates wanted to create the successor to the great post-war corporate research groups (ex: Bell Labs). I find the idea that Gates would really aspire to create a patent troll when there are much more exciting things to do with 1000 phds. (Disclaimer: I work for MSFT, but now MS Research)
- BananaRepublic 15y ago
  Well, Kinect owes quite alot to PrimeSense so I certainly wouldn't categorize it as a 'MS Research' product.
  - Dn_Ab 15y ago
    Balance. In seeking to lift one group you cast aside another hard working group of people. Certainly PrimeSense contributed much, but to discount the hard work of those in MS Research as something less by wrapping them in quotes only serves to despoil your message. You commit that which you wish to redress. See what Johnny Chung Lee said of his time there for a more balanced look of the records.
    - BananaRepublic 15y ago
      Ehh, given how much Kinect relies on the functionality offered by PrimeSense, I'd think it would rather be UNBALANCED to claim it to come from MS Research.
      - contravert 15y ago
        The Kinect only relies on Prime Sense in the form of their hardware. All the algorithms and software are entirely developed by MS Research. This point is made more clear by the fact that Microsoft didn't acquire exclusive rights from Prime Sense but is instead banking on the superiority of their algorithms. I've played around with the Kinect, and without Microsoft's code, all you really get from the hardware is a depth image (think an RGB image with distance from camera for each pixel instead of intensity). Everything else is developed by Microsoft, and it is not an easy feat. Prime Sense developed their own software for pose detection and tracking, but it is inferior to the XBox360 implementation.
shadowfox 15y ago
Just a note: Cleartype was indeed invented by the ebooks team originally. But the algorithm was significantly improved with the help of John Platt at MSR. This is one of his early papers on the topic: http://research.microsoft.com/apps/pubs/?id=68972 http://research.microsoft.com/apps/pubs/?id=68972
deleted 15y ago
[deleted]

webjprgm 15y ago

Their work is used in the academic community. E.g. they have a suite for examining/debugging concurrency called CHESS which was used in a class I took in grad school and is related to and referenced by some of the research my (former) academic advisor professor does, which work is used by NASA to improve space program software.

BananaRepublic 15y ago
Yes, and like their other MS Research projects it's licenced under the 'Microsoft Research Licence' which means that whatever modifications/enhancements you do to the code can only be used within this academic setting. HOWEVER, Microsoft themselves can use your modifications for whatever purposes they want, like sell them. Sweet deal...
- kelnos 15y ago
  As with any other software license (including the GPL), if you don't like the terms, don't use it.
  - rbanffy 15y ago
    Isn't it a bit misleading to put the MRL and the GPL in the same league? I agree with the "If you don't like the license, don't use the software" attitude, but the terms of the MRL are quite restrictive.

DaveMebs 15y ago

There are going to be plenty of things that come out of MS Research that people don't realize came from there (examples: PhotoSynth, Kinect). Expecting an exhaustive list is unrealistic. Furthermore, MS Research was founded over a decade ago when patent trolling was not as big a deal. It's pretty clear if you read about it that Bill Gates wanted to create the successor to the great post-war corporate research groups (ex: Bell Labs). I find the idea that Gates would really aspire to create a patent troll when there are much more exciting things to do with 1000 phds. (Disclaimer: I work for MSFT, but now MS Research)

BananaRepublic 15y ago
Well, Kinect owes quite alot to PrimeSense so I certainly wouldn't categorize it as a 'MS Research' product.
- Dn_Ab 15y ago
  Balance. In seeking to lift one group you cast aside another hard working group of people. Certainly PrimeSense contributed much, but to discount the hard work of those in MS Research as something less by wrapping them in quotes only serves to despoil your message. You commit that which you wish to redress. See what Johnny Chung Lee said of his time there for a more balanced look of the records.
  - BananaRepublic 15y ago
    Ehh, given how much Kinect relies on the functionality offered by PrimeSense, I'd think it would rather be UNBALANCED to claim it to come from MS Research.
    - contravert 15y ago
      The Kinect only relies on Prime Sense in the form of their hardware. All the algorithms and software are entirely developed by MS Research. This point is made more clear by the fact that Microsoft didn't acquire exclusive rights from Prime Sense but is instead banking on the superiority of their algorithms. I've played around with the Kinect, and without Microsoft's code, all you really get from the hardware is a depth image (think an RGB image with distance from camera for each pixel instead of intensity). Everything else is developed by Microsoft, and it is not an easy feat. Prime Sense developed their own software for pose detection and tracking, but it is inferior to the XBox360 implementation.

shadowfox 15y ago

Just a note: Cleartype was indeed invented by the ebooks team originally. But the algorithm was significantly improved with the help of John Platt at MSR. This is one of his early papers on the topic: http://research.microsoft.com/apps/pubs/?id=68972 http://research.microsoft.com/apps/pubs/?id=68972

deleted 15y ago

[deleted]