> >Put another way, he didn't work around any computer controls to get at the information. > That's irrelevant. You can do unauthorized things without having t

> >Put another way, he didn't work around any computer controls to get at the information. > That's irrelevant. You can do unauthorized things without having to "work around" controls. You are conflating bypassing security measures (which in the digital world would be equivalent of lock picking) and abuse of trust (throwing a party and trashing the home of someone who trusted you with the keys to only feed the cat).