4 ms·

Since I don't know who she is and don't want to click, I'm wondering how this compares to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bollea_v._Gawker https://en.wikipedia.or

• wearywanderer 5y ago
  In the case of Katie Hill, there is the matter of the employee/employer relationship. Apparently this is also contrary to the House of Representatives code of official conduct (clause 18a): https://ethics.house.gov/publications/code-official-conduct https://ethics.house.gov/publications/code-official-conduct (It would also be against the rules in every office I've ever worked in.) > 18. (a) A Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner may not engage in a sexual relationship with any employee of the House who works under the supervision of the Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner, or who is an employee of a committee on which the Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner serves. This paragraph does not apply with respect to any relationship between two people who are married to each other. Of this, Speaker Pelosi said "[Hill made] some errors in judgment that made her continued service as a Member untenable. We must ensure a climate of integrity and dignity in the Congress, and in all workplaces."
• jpxw 5y ago
  I’d suggest that case is a bit different, because the tape was leaked purely because it was a sex tape. Also Hogan is a private citizen. In this case, there was at least some other motive (exposing an elected public official engaging in an unethical/inappropriate/potentially abusive* relationship with one of her staffers). *: I don’t know whether the relationship was actually abusive