3 ms·
Lets say you have two equally qualified candidates. It sounds like you believe that choosing the "diverse" candidate over the majority candidate is discriminat
by slg 5y ago
Lets say you have two equally qualified candidates. It sounds like you believe that choosing the "diverse" candidate over the majority candidate is discriminatory. If that is the case, why isn't choosing the majority candidate discriminatory against the "diverse" candidate?
Diversity goals are not created in order to encourage hiring less capable people. They are challenging companies to work harder on finding the capable "diverse" candidates, reevaluating what it means to be qualified, and whether those qualification criteria actually indicate a capability to perform the job.
- xedrac 5y agoWith two equally skilled candidates, defaulting to either candidate because of their race/gender/etc is still discrimination. Flipping a coin would be more fair. I honestly haven't encountered this situation though. You could argue that's because of bias, or my definition of qualified, but I have interviewed and hired some very skilled "diverse" candidates. And I've rejected countless "majority" candidates.