3 ms·
Yep, I think this was a small win for the opponents of CFAA but this is a total show of force of the supreme court. This law is famously broad and to interpret
by r0m4n0 5y ago
Yep, I think this was a small win for the opponents of CFAA but this is a total show of force of the supreme court. This law is famously broad and to interpret it in its literal sense would mean the mass majority of the nation would be federal criminals (they point out some of the scenarios in the article).
Instead of law makers fixing the problem, the supreme court is effectively reading between the lines. Luckily IMHO they are doing the right thing here and will put this particular employer based scenario to rest.
Now to clarify on the countless other holes in the CFAA...