4 ms·
mid-2020s should probably be read as more ~2025 +/- 1
by andromeduck 5y ago
mid-2020s should probably be read as more ~2025 +/- 1
- JumpCrisscross 5y ago> mid-2020s should probably be read as more ~2025 +/- 1 Estimating mid-2020s on a start-up’s new platform and landing it in 2028 is a massive win and far from B.S.
- ksec 5y agoMy fault. In that case those statement are perfectly fine in my book. Thanks for pointing it out.