3 ms·
My experience is the opposite. Gitlab has a lot of features but they are all half-baked. Ever time I try out a feature, I feel like I get bit for doing so. A
by epage 5y ago
My experience is the opposite. Gitlab has a lot of features but they are all half-baked. Ever time I try out a feature, I feel like I get bit for doing so.
A couple of cases
- At first child pipelines couldn't access artifacts from the parent job. Now you can opt-in to it but nothing enforces sequencing
- Some features only work with "needs" (getting parent pipeline artifacts) while others only work without it (depending on an entire stage)
- When a job you "needs" doesn't exist, instead of having a sane behavior (e.g. skip yourself), the pipeline errors. Correctly propagating and maintaining all of the rules correctly in a moderately complex pipeline is ... difficult.
- nawgz 5y ago> At first child pipelines couldn't access artifacts from the parent job Why would you use the tool like this? Make jobs / blocks that generate artifacts, and then chain them together into a workflow so there isn't hierarchical issues. Now, maybe I am working in a simplistic world, but: the only time I have parent / child relationships is when a repo or service is built and another pipeline is invoked to run integration tests or deployments. What situations have lead you to needing to pass artifacts between pipelines and not job stages? > When a job you "needs" doesn't exist, instead of having a sane behavior ... the pipeline errors You and I may work in very different worlds, but I personally would be quite offended if a dependency graph workflow executor saw a node with an explicitly specified dependency missing and proceeded to NOT error.
- diroussel 5y agoI think there are missing concepts and features in gitlab. And the advertised features don’t really match reality. But it’s still way better than Jenkins, as you can work around any issues and it’s clear how it works. It’s just a yaml file.