3 ms·
This seems to me to be the correct decision. Van Buren should have been charged with: GA 332: Abuse of official power GA 333: Exceeding official powers GA 338:
by dsr_ 5y ago
This seems to me to be the correct decision. Van Buren should have been charged with:
GA 332: Abuse of official power
GA 333: Exceeding official powers
GA 338: Bribe-taking
and, Federally, 18USC 201, which prohibits public officials from taking bribes.
- a1369209993 5y agoThere should be some snooping/violation-of-privacy charges as well, but otherwise that sounds about right. CFAA is not relevant here.
- a1369209993 5y ago> CFAA is not relevant here. Er, CFAA is not relevant to the criminal case againt Van Buren, I mean.
- Natsu 5y agoI'd imagine they were, by the time things get to the Supreme Court, they're dealing with very narrow issues of law and not the entire case.