> Of course yes it is - its less valuable after it is created because copying it costs nothing. I think you can apply that same argument to something like a no

> Of course yes it is - its less valuable after it is created because copying it costs nothing. I think you can apply that same argument to something like a normal painting. Sure, the price for making copy isn’t zero, but it’s practically zero when comparing to the millions of dollars that the most expensive paintings are sold for. So why do people pay so much then? Because they want the original. That also applies for wanting to own the original version of a digital painting.