3 ms·
That's clearly not the motivation behind it otherwise age and political diversity would be similarly prioritized.
by fighterpilot 5y ago
That's clearly not the motivation behind it otherwise age and political diversity would be similarly prioritized.
- tshaddox 5y agoI don't think anyone is claiming that their priorities couldn't be improved.
- fighterpilot 5y agoThe priorities won't change because the priorities were never stemming from an earnest attempt to represent customer demographics to begin with. Not only is there no attempt to represent customer demographics on dimensions such as age, but there continues to be rank discrimination against people based on these dimensions, and the people pretending to be in favor of diversity are consistently and conspicuously silent on the matter.
- joshuamorton 5y agoAge is somewhat prioritized in practice. Why do you think political diversity would be similarly prioritized? There's a moral argument that comes into play with politics that doesn't for age or race. There's nothing even abstractly morally problematic about making your product appeal to women or old people or whomever. There may be reasons to avoid marketing or aligning your product to, say, people whose political views you disagree with.
- fighterpilot 5y agoWe're not talking about products aimed at a particular demographic. We're talking about products with customers from diverse demographic backgrounds, where the argument is put that we should then have a diverse team so as to ensure we are serving that product competently to the diverse customer base. My point is that this can't be the real reason for D and I initiatives, since if it was, there would be a similarly strong push to have equal political and age representation in order to reflect the reality of these products' customer demographics.