You're getting it wrong. He sent mail to the GCC mailing list. And even if he had sent it to RMS, how would the failure be described as Lattner's choice to "n

You're getting it wrong. He sent mail to the GCC mailing list. And even if he had sent it to RMS, how would the failure be described as Lattner's choice to "not follow up with RMS"? How could it be accurately described as anything other than the opposite: RMS not following up with Lattner?