4 ms·
He said Jew, not Israeli. He is intentional in the use as the entire article is about Jews and Israel. Also the person in question is not an idiot, he is a matu
by wonderwonder 5y ago
He said Jew, not Israeli. He is intentional in the use as the entire article is about Jews and Israel. Also the person in question is not an idiot, he is a mature adult smart enough to work in stem at Google. Your argument essentially absolves any anti semitic statements / actions by blaming the Jews for it.
This is exactly the definition of anti-semitism, and now I am speaking about your words, not his.
- lacksconfidence 5y agoI'm being as clear as i can, when I read the document I don't see anything about "the jewish race". What i see is commentary on the jewish nation of israel. I can only blame israel for bluring that distinction as much as possible.
- wonderwonder 5y agoNo need to clarify, I very much understand what you see. The fact that that is what you see is the problem.
- lacksconfidence 5y agoHonestly, I have no clue what you are trying to say. Clearly we have different definitions of anti-semitism? To me anti-semitism is a form of racism. By definition being opposed to the political actions of a nation is not racism. It could have underlying racist motives, but you cannot ascribe those from the position that a nation state is doing inappropriate things.
- bagacrap 5y agoquestioning the definition of anti semitism is anti semitic?
- mikewarot 5y ago>He is intentional in the use as the entire article is about Jews and Israel. Determining intent from a single page of text is about as solvable as the halting problem.