8 ms·
1. There's a lot of irony in your statement, since Jewish people were slaughtered and horribly mistreated in those other countries simply for being Jewish. So
by myfavoritedog 5y ago
1. There's a lot of irony in your statement, since Jewish people were slaughtered and horribly mistreated in those other countries simply for being Jewish. So how have they not been ethno-states... or at least "anti-specific-ethno states"?
2. There are plenty of countries that are dominated by Islam, and yet their right to exist isn't generally questioned.
- ttt0 5y agoYes, they used to be. That's usually how nations are born - around common ethnicity. And that's the point, everyone else got criticized for it except for Israel, which has a bipartisan support (at least in America). And any critique of Israel being a Jewish state is somehow portrayed as a double standard against Jews. At the same time you can freely attack white, non-Jewish people on the basis of what European and American governments did without any fear of repercussions. Not saying that there should be repercussions, because I support free speech, just pointing this out. The first part of your comment refers to Jews as ethnicity and the second as religion.