> but there's no reason to go ballistic over a 15 year old blog post. While I agree in principle I hope this is part of a new trend rather than an exemption fo

> but there's no reason to go ballistic over a 15 year old blog post. While I agree in principle I hope this is part of a new trend rather than an exemption for this case because his content is so much more offensive than anything Teen Vogue editor Alex McCammond ever said.