I think a hybrid approach is good inasmuch as it gives HR less to complain about. WFH has so far proven to work and the whole theory that people must be visibly

I think a hybrid approach is good inasmuch as it gives HR less to complain about. WFH has so far proven to work and the whole theory that people must be visibly managed to keep working or just be productive and profitable has been proven false. It's time to let go of the dogmatic approach to how work is done (whether it's wholly WFH or on-site).