4 ms·
The "Control Panel for Reporting Illegal and Harmful Information." is link to government website for user to report illegal and harmful information. It is a lin
by powerapple 5y ago
The "Control Panel for Reporting Illegal and Harmful Information." is link to government website for user to report illegal and harmful information. It is a link, not part of gitee website.
It is better translated into "Portal for Reporting Illegal and Harmful Information", the linked website is: https://12377.cn/ https://12377.cn/
- BelenusMordred 5y agoIt's basically the report button on github. This 1 hour old account clearly has an axe to grind. The criticisms aren't even decent.
- serf 5y ago>It's basically the report button on github. No, it isn't. The report button for github goes here.[0] A github hosted feedback/review system. The link on gitee goes here[1]. A website ran by "Central Information Office Network (National Internet Information Office)" , Beijing. If you can't spot the difference in methodologies then I'm not sure what else to say. [0]: https://support.github.com/contact/report-abuse?category=report-abuse&report=other&report_type=unspecified https://support.github.com/contact/report-abuse?category=rep... [1]: https://12377.cn/ https://12377.cn/
- Daho0n 5y agoDid you follow the link and read what is supposed to reported?
- BelenusMordred 5y agoCountries have different rules, the world is a diverse place. I know that's hard for some to accept but it's how it is. Is having a button to report crime on your website some horrible end-of-the-world moment? Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, etc. all have these buttons on their site and often don't report actual crimes occurring on their platform to the police in order to protect themselves. Gitee is simply providing a link elsewhere for people who have a problem with content. A UK man on youtube taught his dog to salute and got arrested for it because people reported it. A pregnant woman in Australia was thrown in jail for organising an anti-lockdown protest on Facebook. Many locals cheered these events on with gusto. The people who decry the oppression in China, also actively support the suppression of opposing views and jokes back home. Maybe we aren't so different after all. If you want to rant about Chinese laws without hiding behind the pretext of mobile OS discussion, make a proper HN thread about it or write a blogpost mate.
- anoncake 5y ago> Countries have different rules, the world is a diverse place. Some countries have democratic governments, others have illegitimate ones. Some rules are totalitarian, others are not. > Is having a button to report crime on your website some horrible end-of-the-world moment? That it isn't literally the worst thing possible is hardly a convincing argument. > Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, etc. all have these buttons on their site Incorrect, as you've just been told. > A UK man on youtube taught his dog to salute and got arrested for it because people reported it. A Nazi salute. I guess you forgot that detail. > A pregnant woman in Australia was thrown in jail for organising an anti-lockdown protest on Facebook. I don't know the context but that sounds pretty bad. But how does it excuse the CCP? > The people who decry the oppression in China, also actively support the suppression of opposing views and jokes back home. Maybe we aren't so different after all. 1. It makes a difference what views you believe should be suppressed. Trying to protect democracy and rule of law is fundamentally different from trying to protect the CCP autocracy. 2. The set of people opposed to the CCP autocracy isn't actually identical to the set of people who "support the suppression of opposing views and jokes back home". > If you want to rant about Chinese laws without hiding behind the pretext of mobile OS discussion, make a proper HN thread about it or write a blogpost mate. Why, because you want their "rant" to be less visible?
- trasz 5y ago> Some countries have democratic governments, others have illegitimate ones. Sure, for example it’s not uncommon in the US to ignore the majority vote and choose somebody else for president because of a fundamental design error in its voting rules.