3 ms·
I take offense in the proposed alternative pictures. There are lots of war related gear shown - military propaganda - potential disturbs pacifists. Also there i
by hutzlibu 5y ago
I take offense in the proposed alternative pictures. There are lots of war related gear shown - military propaganda - potential disturbs pacifists. Also there is a pretty lady shown, too. (I actually did not get, why this is supposed to be sexist?)
Seriously, I doubt you can find any picture at all, where no person find reasons to be offended.
- mypalmike 5y agoBowl of fruit. Easy peasy. It's really not that hard to avoid using a photo from Playboy.
- hutzlibu 5y agoI would not be so sure about it. I am pretty sure, there are parents whose children have a (imagined or real) fructose malabsorption and therefore have to avoid fruits as unhealthy, or will investigate, that the fruits in the picture are from too far away, propagading a climate-harmful livestyle etc. etc. And I bet most people did not know, that the picture in question is from Playboy, I did not. But still, so what? It shows a attractive women in a slightly seductive pose. Is that really sexist? Why?
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]