> That's fine. You can have your opinions on whatever you want. I still don't think you can read papers from most fields :shrug:. That wasn't an argument in yo

> That's fine. You can have your opinions on whatever you want. I still don't think you can read papers from most fields :shrug:. That wasn't an argument in your original comment. You specifically said that people were not scientifically literate unless they were "experts". > I don't choose my words that carefully, so this isn't the point you think it is. One day you will discover that before you are able to make a point you need to learn to choose your words carefully first. Words, like science, have an exact meaning too. > I said knowledgable as some wiggle room. Don't read too much into it. Don't worry, I'm not taking you seriously yet, at least not until you define what precisely does "expert" mean. Nevertheless, it's fun to see how far you are willing to go with your comments without admitting your mistake. > This is an insecurity you have with yourself, creating some weird definition of expert. Like I said, people hate to hear that their opinions don't matter. Which insecurity? Please be specific about your words here too. And let's finally check your premises. What's your definition of an "expert"?