>There is so much that goes into that blurb that you cannot even comprehend unless you work at a security agency/company, and many times on the specific inciden

>There is so much that goes into that blurb that you cannot even comprehend unless you work at a security agency/company, and many times on the specific incident in question. Sure, but as a result that statement could also be full or complete bullshit and anyone not related would be unable to distinguish the difference. The times you've made that statement may have had substantial evidence behind them, but (presumably) you know just as much as me about what's being used to make this statement.