5 ms·
That’s a very cynical take. Morally indefensible? That’s an incredible hyperbole. People may quit sure but CEOs are responsible for getting value to share holde
by ripper1138 5y ago
That’s a very cynical take. Morally indefensible? That’s an incredible hyperbole. People may quit sure but CEOs are responsible for getting value to share holders and many honestly do believe that in office or hybrid model works toward that goal. If it was only about office space they could write that off and be done with it.
- hvasilev 5y agoWhat value are they getting to the share holders by making people work partially from the office?
- cyberpsybin 5y agoGot keep eyes on the slaves. What else.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- sam0x17 5y agoIt shouldn't be hyperbolic, but that's the world we live in. CEOs have even less of an excuse to not work from home.
- sam0x17 5y agoHow can you justify a ton of pollution, a ton of emotional and actual energy lost to commuting, millions (or billions) of dollars in real estate fees, only to reduce productivity because most studies are showing a productivity increase when working from home? There is a point where it becomes morally indefensible, and we're well past it.